Chinese firms need specialist expertise

Chinese companies will continue to see rising demand for bilingual talent, experts in Internet technology and human resources in 2018 amid globalization and China’s Internet Plus strategy.

People who move to new jobs can expect an average salary increment of 10 to 20 percent while those who stay in their jobs can see a 5 to 8 percent rise in China in 2018, according to a report by Robert Walters, a global recruitment consultancy.

This year is likely to see a generally steady salary increase with an average 15 to 20 percent rise, but cooling from a rally last year.

With China being the biggest e-commerce market globally with rapid development in digital payments, automation, big data and artificial intelligence under the Internet Plus strategy, employees in information technology companies who change jobs may see a 12 to 18 percent jump in salary, according to the report yesterday.

The Belt and Road initiative and the Go Globally strategy are also driving Chinese companies to pursue bilingual professionals who have experience in international companies and understanding of local markets.

“The demand for bilingual talents is expected to rise sharply by over 50 percent in several years,” said Sean Li, associate director of the Shanghai branch of Robert Walters.

Global firms hike spending on R&D

As China shifts its focus to attract more foreign investment in high-end manufacturing, services and green industry to transform its economy, overseas companies are pouring in additional funds to develop research and service-based businesses in China to maintain robust growth.

Many of these opportunities also come from the country’s growing demand for consumption-related products and services, diversified market channels created by the Belt and Road Initiative and free trade deals with partner countries, as well as the hunger for more homemade sophisticated industrial products.

Thanks to the government’s resolve to attract more foreign direct investment this year, segments newly identified as key to sustained growth?automation,

digitalization, financial and healthcare services, aviation, environmental technologies and renewable energy businesses?are all expected to benefit.

China’s key areas for economic reform and industrial upgrading will grow into new opportunities in many German companies’ investment plans, said Alexandra Voss, a member of the German Chamber of Commerce’s all-China board.

“Consumption-related sectors will remain hot, and sectors that get well with China’s new direction of economic growth, including high-tech, services and new energy, will also see more foreign investment,” said Voss.

“Due to rising labor costs and weak global market demand, China is veering towards growth reliant on domestic consumption, rather than exports,” said Gao Peiyong, director of the Institute of Economics at the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences.

Gao said companies from Europe, Japan and the United States have already discovered that it is time to invest more in Chinese research and development, as well as its science and technology and design businesses.

New growth points are expected to present themselves as the economy becomes more sophisticated.

Under government policies issued in January, foreign companies will be encouraged to invest in high-end, smart and green manufacturing; to set up research and development centers; and to strengthen cooperation with domestic peers. They will also be allowed to join national science and technology programs.

US-based Emerson Electric Co opened a new measurement technology center in Beijing on November 14 to serve its automation solutions business in China and across Asia. The facility, representing an investment of $28 million, includes the company’s first China solutions center for customers and a newly built and expanded manufacturing plant to meet domestic and Asia-Pacific market demand.

David Farr, chairman and chief executive officer of Emerson, said with this new center, the company will be able to engage in closer collaboration with its customers in China in helping the industry adopt digital transformation technologies, as a growing number of Chinese companies are leveraging the growth potential arising from digitalization.

Siemens AG and Ningbo-based Consinee Group also kicked off their cooperation in a project for the first intelligent factory in China’s wool textile industry on Nov 27. Involving a total investment of $50 million, Siemens will help its Chinese partner build 10 pilot intelligent production lines with an annual output of 1,000 metric tons of premium cashmere yarns.

Shanghai FTZ finalizes pilot program

‘Parallel auto imports’ will be allowed in new scheme

A pilot scheme for “parallel auto imports” in the China (Shanghai) Pilot Free Trade Zone (FTZ) has been finalized and will be rolled out soon, Xinhua reported Tuesday.

The move is expected to bring down vehicle prices and improve warranties and after-sales services.

“Parallel imports” refer to the practice of car dealers importing genuine vehicles from foreign markets to China without the permission of the manufacturer or the authorized distributor. Prices of cars imported this way are usually 15 percent to 20 percent lower than the cars imported via regular channels, as the import process is simplified, analysts said.

Details of the pilot scheme will be released soon, including the requirements for enterprises that could participate in the scheme and the institution of trade rules, Xinhua quoted Gu Jun, deputy head of Shanghai Municipal Commission of Commerce, as saying.

The State Council released a batch of measures to strengthen China’s imports on November 6, including speeding up the rollout of the pilot program for “parallel car imports.”

“Parallel imports” will drag auto prices to a reasonable level, Gu said.

After the State Council approved the scheme, related authorities have been working to figure out details, especially on the vehicles’ quality safety and after-sales services, said Gu.

Lack of warranties and after-sales services is a major reason that consumers hesitate to buy the parallel imported vehicles. The pilot scheme aims to solve these problems.

Analysts suggest a services center be established in the Shanghai FTZ to provide registration, insurance, tax and maintenance services to cars that are imported through the pilot scheme. Furthermore, existing automobile dealership stores and auto repair shops could also be motivated to provide services to these vehicles.

Cars imported via such “parallel” channels amounted to 83,000 in 2013, accounting for 8 percent of the country’s overall vehicle imports, according to data from China Automobile Dealers Association. Hu Siyu, an official with the association, expected that the number of parallel imported vehicles would rise by 32 percent year-on-year in 2014.

A total of 16 Land Rover and Mercedes-Benz cars were transported by rail to Southwest China’s Chongqing on Thursday, marking the first time that China’s western region has imported autos through “parallel” channels, Xinhua said Tuesday.

It took just 18 days for the vehicles to arrive in Chongqing from Germany’s Duisburg. In comparison, it usually takes at least two months under regular channels, as imported vehicles are shipped to port cities such as Tianjin and Dalian first and then transported to the inland provinces, the report said.

Wal-Mart to shut down outlet in Hangzhou


A customer shops at Wal-Mart’s Zhaohui store in Hangzhou on Tuesday. Wal-Mart, the world’s largest retailer by revenue, decided to shut down more than 20 outlets in China this year.

Closing part of company’s plan to jettison underperforming stores

Wal-Mart Stores Inc, the world’s largest retailer by revenue, plans to shut down another underperforming store?in Hangzhou, Zhejiang province?in late April, while a compensation dispute with employees from an inland store that closed in March remains unsolved.

Hu Yinghua, a saleswoman at Wal-Mart’s Zhaohui store in Hangzhou, said they had a meeting on Wednesday afternoon as a formal notice of the closing of the store by the end of this month.

“The informal notification came on Tuesday night via text message. We have to choose before April 23 whether to be sent to other Wal-Mart stores in the city, or leave the company with a certain amount of compensation,” she said.

Hu said upper-level managers explained during the meeting that the closure was strategically necessary.

There were a few customers at the store on Wednesday, but some shelves were already empty.

Shirley Zhang, media director from Wal-Mart China’s Department of Corporate Affairs, confirmed that the store will close on April 23 as a part of the company’s plan of shutting down those failing to make a profit.

The multinational company has opened about 400 stores on the Chinese mainland since it entered the market in the mid-1990s. The company decided to shut down more than 20 outlets in China this year because those stores comprise about 9 percent of the total, but have contributed only 2 to 3 percent of the total sales volume from 2013 to date, she said.

“We take these moves to achieve quality of growth, and we think the strategy adjustment will help us to better meet the demands of customers,” she said.

Zhang said the company has tried to make proper arrangements for the employees affected by the closures, including allowing them to transfer to any outlet in China and subsidizing their relocation expenses, including transportation and accommodations.

However, the company’s retreat from Changde was not seen as reasonable or fair by most of its local employees. More than 70 out of 135 employees from the store have asked their trade union to seek better compensation from the company after Wal-Mart told the workers on March 5 that the store would be closed in two weeks.

Huang Xingguo, chairman of the Changde store’s trade union, said Wal-Mart did not provide an official notification to the trade union in advance for such a vital decision as the law stipulates and failed to show due respect to its employees.

“The day they announced the closure, employees from other cities arrived at the supermarket to replace our workers. It was humiliating and discriminatory,” said Huang, whom employees elected as the trade union chairman in 2013.

He said the union has asked city authorities for formal arbitration to seek workers’ rights in terms of collective negotiation, higher compensation for the mass layoffs, and pay for time not worked during the dispute.

“We ask Wal-Mart to double the existing compensation, but that is negotiable if the company is willing to resume dialogue,” he said. “However, the company is busy removing its assets and has refused dialogue since late March.”

Huang said Wal-Mart’s tough stance was backed by inappropriate intervention from the local government.

He said the district’s labor department provided written material to recognize that Wal-Mart closed its store in Changde legally, and police arrested several workers who took part in peaceful protests on March 21.

A labor inspection official surnamed Tan from Changde’s Wuling district, who has been working as a mediator in the case, said the situation is “complicated” and urged workers to resort to legal channels to defend their rights.

Zhang, the media director from Wal-Mart China, defended the company’s moves.

“Personally, I feel sympathetic toward these workers and understand their requirement for higher compensation, but our company has to handle that in accordance with the law,” she said.

But Chang Kai, head of the School of Labor and Human Resources at Renmin University of China who participated in the legislation work for the Labor Contract Law from 2006 to 2008, believes Wal-Mart lacks legal justification for its behavior.

“The Changde outlet is just a branch of Wal-Mart, so it can’t terminate employees’ contracts under the name of disbanding the enterprise,” he said. Under Chinese law, the company needs to provide an official resolution from a shareholders meeting to legitimize its decision to end its contracts with employees.

“What Wal-Mart did is actually a mass layoff, which requires the employer to inform workers one month in advance and listen to the trade union’s suggestion for staff reallocation, which Wal-Mart has failed to do,” he said.

Chang also said the trade union of Changde’s Wal-Mart seeking better treatment for workers is significant, as it will set an example for similar cases in the future.

Retirement delayed as China confronts smaller workforce

China plans to raise the retirement age for the first time since the 1950s, as policymakers confront the prospect of a shrinking workforce that damps economic growth.

“The age will rise gradually,” Hu Xiaoyi, a vice minister of human resources and social security, said this month. China’s compulsory retirement ages, now 50 for most women and 60 for men, are likely in 2020 to be about five years higher than they are now, according to economists surveyed by Bloomberg News.

Delaying retirement may be a more effective tool in alleviating labour shortages and driving growth than the easing of the one-child policy announced last month as part of the broadest policy reforms since the 1990s. More than three decades of population control are thinning the ranks of available workers, adding to constraints on expansion as President Xi Jinping’s government seeks to rein in debt-fuelled investment.

“I would think that a lot of people would want to voluntarily work longer if the policies are right,” said Chang Jian, China economist at Barclays Plc in Hong Kong, who formerly worked at the World Bank. “The government would get a lot more mileage from raising the retirement age than a partial relaxation of the one-child policy,” she said.

“Twelve of 18 analysts saw 55 as closest to the 2020 retirement age for women, with five saying 60 and one 65,” according to the Bloomberg News survey, conducted from 22 November to 27 November.

Men’s retirement

The retirement age for men is likely to rise to about 65, according to 14 respondents, while two said it would be closer to 70 and two said it would stay near 60, the survey found.

For women in white-collar jobs, the retirement age is 55, and there are other exceptions such as for heavy labour.

The working-age labor force in China declined by 3.45 million people last year, according to the government. The United Nations has forecast a drop of about 24 million in the population age 15 to 59 from 2015 to 2025, while people age 65 and older will increase by about 66 million.

Scarcity is helping push up labour costs, driving companies such as Samsung Electronics Co. to relocate production to countries including Vietnam.

Raising the male retirement to 65 by 2020 may help keep in the labor force some of what statistics-bureau data show were 41.5 million men age 47 to 51 in 2011. There were 51.5 million women age 37 to 41.

Yu Yongding, a former adviser to the central bank, said a higher retirement age won’t change China’s demographic structure and trends. At the same time, it’s definitely helpful for China’s labour supply, and therefore good for economic growth in the long run, Yu, a senior researcher at the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, said in an interview in Beijing.

Pension shortfall

Fourteen Chinese provinces faced a combined pension shortfall of 76.7 billion yuan ($12.6 billion) in 2011, according to a report by CASS, a state researcher, the official Xinhua News Agency reported in October.

“A delayed retirement age, despite its unpopularity, is helpful for China’s economic growth and development by allowing people to work longer and making more efficient use of labour,” said Li Xiaoping, a Beijing-based researcher with CASS’s Institute of Population and Labour Economics.

“Letting people have more children, while more popular, may carry fewer economic-growth benefits because boosting the population alone doesn’t necessarily help expansion,” Li said.

Wang Yuanlong, a 42-year-old taxicab driver in Beijing, said that if the retirement age is raised to 65, I don’t think it’s worthwhile to make my pension contributions.

“It’s bad to think that I have to work every day when I am 65,” Wang said.

Support growth

Avoiding deeper declines in the labour force may help support economic growth that analysts forecast will slow. Expansion will decelerate to 7.4% in 2014 and 7.2% in 2015, according to median estimates of economists in a separate Bloomberg News survey this month.

China is also trying to sustain growth by encouraging some of the 600 million-plus rural residents to relocate to cities and better integrating the 260 million migrant workers who live in urban areas without getting full access to schools and other municipal benefits.

The Communist Party said last month that couples will be allowed to have a second child if either parent is an only child, instead of both parents. The party said it would consider raising the retirement age.

“Delaying retirement will slow the process of China’s labour surplus becoming a deficit,” said Zhu Haibin, Hong Kong-based chief China economist at JPMorgan Chase and Co. The shift will have a much bigger impact on the economy than the change in the one-child policy, because that will only start to affect the labour force in 20 years’ time, Zhu said.

Life expectancy

China isn’t the only nation grappling with the issue. The UK plans to raise the pension age to 66 from 65 by 2020 and may raise it to 68 by the mid-2030s. Australia’s pension age is scheduled to rise to 67 from 65 by 2023, and the government may need to increase it later to 70, the nation’s Productivity Commission said in a research paper last month.

“National average life expectancy in China was 72 for men and 77 for women in 2010,” according to government data. The highest was 82 for women in Beijing and Shanghai.

“The age of 50 or 60 is no longer regarded as old,” Yang Yansui, director of Tsinghua University’s Research Center of Employment and Social Security, said in Beijing. “The pension system just can’t be sustained if the pension access age is not extended.”

Shanghai elderly open to house-for-pension plan

More than 70 percent of elderly people in Shanghai are open to a house-for-pension program, a survey showed, despite a recent public outcry against the idea raised in a central government document.

According to the Shanghai investigation team under the National Bureau of Statistics, the program was supported by 73 percent of respondents as a possible means to ease the burden on elderly people in an aging society where people are choosing to have fewer or no children.

Under the program, an elderly person who owns a property could deed the house to an insurance company or bank, which would determine the value of the property and the applicant’s life expectancy, and pay out a fixed amount of money every month.

The survey of 2,248 residents aged from 60 to 79 who have lived in Shanghai for more than one year found only 27 percent of respondents were firmly against the idea, the bureau’s investigation team said in a report.

Those against the program cited various reasons including the possibility of family disputes, and that they don’t need the program because their children will care for them in their old age.

Respondents in rural areas said the program is impossible because the land used for building rural houses cannot be traded.

Earlier this month, the State Council, China’s cabinet, issued a document promising a complete social care network for people over the age of 60 by 2020.

The house-for-pension program, together with other policies such as encouraging private investment in elder care services, is dedicated to serving the world’s largest population of elderly.

But the proposal drew wide criticism, with many suggesting that it shows the government is preparing to pay less attention to elder care services.

Experts said those respondents who said yes to the idea would not necessarily utilize the program.

“Intuitively, it is impossible to have such a high rate of people accepting the idea,” said Feng Jin, a professor at Fudan University’s Economics School.

“If you casually ask them, they may say yes to the program. But when they are requested to make the decision to mortgage their houses for a pension, it will be a different thing,” she added.

In the United States, where a similar program has been in place for more than 20 years, only 2 percent of people aged 65 or above have mortgaged their houses for a pension, according to Feng.

In Hong Kong, only 11 percent of property owners accepted the idea, based on a survey in 2000 of 1,867 Hong Kong residents aged between 49 and 59.

A pilot program to test the idea by China Citic Bank in Shanghai proved unsuccessful because it did not comply with market demand, Feng added.

Yang Lei, founder of Huoban Jujia Homecare Service, said some elderly people showed interest in the program when she raised it.

All were childless or had children who had settled overseas, she said. “They accept the idea because they don’t have a person to inherit their property,” she added.

It is reasonable therefore that some oppose the idea in order to leave their house to their children, she said.
Wang Xiuzhen, 64, a retired worker, said a clear no to the proposal. “We are not Westerners. Asian culture promotes that you need to leave some heritage for your children.”

The Shanghai survey also found 87.5 percent of respondents agreed with the concept of “raising sons to help in old age”, and 67.3 percent supported the traditional concept of the family supporting its elderly members.

The respondents expected the authorities to provide more beds at care centers, improve community-based caring services and enhance the service level of those engaged in the sector, the survey found.

By the end of 2012, Shanghai had 3.67 million people aged 60 or older, accounting for 25.7 percent of its total registered population, according to Shanghai Civil Affairs Bureau. Shanghai also has millions of migrants who are not registered in the city.

Ministry of Human Resources and Social Security Seeks Comments on Regulating Labor Dispatch

China’s Ministry of Human Resources and Social Security issued provisions that align closely with recent changes to the PRC Labor Contract Law in order to help standardize labor dispatch in the country. The draft calls for a clearer definition of auxiliary positions, which will affect employers that historically employ a large amount of dispatched employees. However, a grace period is also provided so that employers can adjust their employment models in China.

On 7 August 2013, the Ministry of Human Resources and Social Security of the People’s Republic of China promulgated “Several Provisions on Labor Dispatch (Draft for Comments)” (the Draft) to solicit public opinion on how to regulate the labor dispatch in the country. This effort is intended to echo the Decision of Amendment of the Labor Contract Law (the Decision), effective from 1 July 2013, for the purpose of detailing the rules for labor dispatch and providing implementation guidance.

Highlights

Union Involvement

The Draft echoes the Decision’s recommendation that labor dispatch shall only apply to positions of temporary, auxiliary and substitutive nature (Three Characters). In addition to the established definitions that a temporary position applies only to a position lasting no longer than six months, and a substitutive position applies to a position vacated for off-work studies, time off, etc., the Draft specifies that an employer shall propose the list of auxiliary positions in line with industry features and business operation needs, and confirm the list upon consultation with a labor union or employee representative meeting before making it public.

The Draft further reinforces the supervisory function of the labor union in that if an employer violates the provisions—especially regarding Three Characters—or the maximum ratio of dispatched employees, the labor union is entitled to raise concerns and ask for corrective actions.

Maximum Ratio of Dispatched Employees

The Draft mandates 10 per cent as the maximum ratio for dispatched employees among the total employee pool of an employer. That said, an employer cannot unlimitedly set auxiliary positions and should be limited to the ratio ceiling at 10 per cent. Such limitation would have a great impact on companies that have a large amount of dispatched employees, and certain adjustments would be accommodated in order to comply with the law, as well as optimize the benefits for the business.

Expanded Coverage of Labor Dispatch Services

According to the Draft, if an employer subcontracts certain business operations to a third-party contractor but still takes direct control and management of the employees of the said contractor, such subcontracting behavior shall be regarded as labor dispatch, and therefore subject to the regulations on labor dispatch.

This expanded definition of labor dispatch is meant to prevent an employer from taking advantage of the subcontract to circumvent the restrictions and limitations for labor dispatch, including, but without limitation to, the maximum ratio of dispatched employees. Therefore, it requires special attention and due consideration when an employer intends to adopt the subcontracting model for certain parts of its business operations.

Liability

The penalty for violating the rules on labor dispatch is RMB 5,000 to RMB 10,000 per person. It is worth noting, however, that if an employer violates the relevant rules on labor dispatch, especially those of “Three Characters” and the ratio ceiling of auxiliary positions, and makes no rectification within one month of being given administrative penalty, the dispatched employees will be deemed to have established an employment relationship with the employer, and the employment contract will be deemed to take effect one day after the end of the one-month period after receiving the penalty.

Grace Period

The Draft provides a grace period for employers to be compliant. That said, any labor dispatch duly established prior to 1 July 2013, when the Decision took effect, shall continue to be in force until the expiration of the term period, which is up to two years. If the existing labor dispatch does not follow the “Equal Pay for Work of Equal Value” principle, it is further proposed that the amendment shall be made accordingly and immediately. Further, for any employer that has a large amount of dispatched employees exceeding the 10 per cent ratio ceiling, it shall not recruit any new dispatched employees, even for auxiliary positions.

Conclusion

To summarize, the Draft calls for clear identification of the auxiliary positions through participation in either a labor union or employee representative meeting followed by the strict 10 per cent ratio ceiling for all auxiliary positions in any event. This gives little room for an employer to maneuver if such employer historically has had a large amount of dispatched employees. However, the Draft also provides for a grace period so that an employer could take time to consider and adjust its employment model in China.

Hard times for grads

Only about 28 percent of graduates and 37 percent of postgraduates in Beijing had signed employment contracts as of late April, according to figures from the Beijing Municipal Commission of Education, the Beijing Times reported.

The changes in the international and domestic economic environment are the main reasons leading to the low employment rates of Chinese graduates this year, said an official from the commission. A total of 6.99 million college students will have graduated by June in China, the highest number since 1949.

China Moves to Temper Growth

BEIJING—China set a growth target of around 7.5% for this year as it kicked off a meeting to finalize its leadership transition, reflecting how Beijing is turning away from breakneck growth based on exports in favor of a broader economy driven by spending at home.

China’s ambitions for more moderate growth come after decades of double-digit increases and are a centerpiece of new leaders’ plans to be detailed during the annual National People’s Congress, which began Tuesday.

“We should unswervingly take expanding domestic demand as our long-term strategy for domestic development,” said Premier Wen Jiabao, delivering his final report to the congress after 10 years at the helm. The key to that change, he said, is to “enhance people’s ability to consume.”

Beijing’s broader goal is to shift the economy away from reliance on investment and exports, with a stronger role for domestic consumption, as it kick starts painful reforms to rebalance the country’s economic model.

Underpinning that is an ambitious plan to raise household income and ensure more equal distribution of national wealth.

A stronger social safety net, which frees up money for households to spend, is an important part of the plan. The central government promised a substantial 27% increase in its health-care spending to $41.8 billion, and spending on employment and social welfare is also rising fast.

Mr. Wen also reiterated commitments to bring China’s 200 million-plus migrant workers into the urban social welfare system and provide stronger protections for farmers’ land rights, both seen as crucial to support higher household income and greater social equity.

On other economic matters, leaders reduced the inflation target to 3.5% from 4% in 2012, reflecting a goal of keeping expected price rises from accelerating too much. The fiscal deficit target was set at around 2% of GDP, up from 1.5% in 2012, as Beijing puts its relatively healthy balance sheet to work in support of growth.

In the days leading up to the legislative meeting, China’s government aggressively struck at once-again-surging housing prices, showing leaders’ determination not to let a property bubble push the economy off track or breed dissatisfaction with the government just as a new guard is taking over.

The growth target maintains the goal for stable growth set out last year and isn’t a forecast—China routinely exceeds its targets. Last year’s growth was 7.8%.

During the National People’s Congress, eyes are on the new leadership under Xi Jinping, the Communist Party chief to be named president during the meeting, to see whether it will go beyond rhetoric to make the difficult changes required to raise household income and boost consumption spending.

Details on the timeline and implementation of reforms remain vague. And crucial questions remain unanswered on how cash-strapped local governments will pay for changes. Some analysts expect a major Communist Party meeting in October to fill in the blanks.

A bubbly property sector has been a key feature of China’s unbalanced growth. Rising house prices drove overinvestment in real estate, and also crimped consumption by forcing households to scrimp and save to get their foot on the housing ladder. Leaders have worried about social frictions caused by housing that is out of reach for average earners.

The renewed controls to tame the property sector, a major contributor to growth, suggest the government is prepared to safeguard the gains from three years of attempts to make buying a home more affordable for the middle class—even if it dents the growth outlook.

The realization that leaders are retightening screws surprised markets, which like many property buyers had concluded that leaders were satisfied with the results of repeated tightening and willing to tolerate a gradual return to rising prices and sales.

Shares of Chinese developers plummeted on Monday, the first day of trading after policy makers said on Friday that they would strictly enforce a capital-gains tax of 20% on profits from home sales. China’s State Council, or cabinet, also said it would reinforce controls on who is allowed to buy a home and push banks to raise down-payment and mortgage rates for second-home buyers in some cities.

The repeated tightening had resulted in prices leveling out. But in the past few months, house prices in China’s top-tier cities have again started to rise at alarming rates. Average prices for property in Shanghai were up 41% from a year earlier in the first two months of the year, and Beijing prices are also rising fast, according to data from real-estate agency Soufun.

“The government has not been able to break the cycle of expectations pushing prices higher and driving higher expectations. Someone has to get hurt, to convince people China’s property is not a surefire bet,” said Mark Williams, China economist at Capital Economics.

Shenzhen-listed China Vanke Co., 000002.SZ +0.46% China’s largest developer by volume was one of several property stocks to plunge the daily 10% trading limit Monday. The property hit helped drag China’s benchmark Shanghai Composite Index down 3.7% for the day. Mainland developers in Hong Kong also fell sharply.

The market appeared to regain its footing in early trading Tuesday, with the Shanghai and Hong Kong markets opening fractionally up.

The recent uptick in property prices had raised questions about whether policy makers can deliver a more permanent solution to the problems of the housing market. Reaction to the latest moves in Shanghai was that they were likely to have a strong effect.

“Home prices will definitely take a hit once the new regulations are in place,” said Chen Jun, a real-estate agent at Haiyu Dichan, a property agency in Shanghai.

Developers also took the move as a sign of the central government’s determination to tighten the market. It “strengthens our view on the long-term nature of the property curbs,” said a spokesman for China Vanke.

The measures to quell housing costs since April 2010 have left China’s central government in a game of whack-a-mole with real-estate developers, local governments and speculators—all of whom have an interest in continued rapid increases in prices.

Leaders’ efforts started to bring house prices back into line with income but did little to address the fundamental causes of China’s property bubble, analysts say. Limited alternative investment options for households, local government reliance on land sales as a source of finance and the persistent belief that China’s house prices can only go up meant the pressure for unsustainable rises in prices remains.

The latest moves appear aimed at preventing sharp increases in home prices spreading from China’s first-tier cities to provincial capitals and smaller cities, where prices remain subdued. “The evidence is that prices in second-tier cities follow the top tier with a lag of a few months,” said Jinsong Du, China real estate analyst at Credit Suisse. “The government wants to get ahead of that.”

Property developers face the prospect of slower sales. Yuzhou Properties Co., 1628.HK -1.01% a developer in the southeastern city of Xiamen, said the new rules would delay the launch of their high-end homes. “We have to wait for an opportune time to launch the villas,” said Leo Yang, investor-relations manager. “You can’t possibly launch it when the country is going through a tightening phase.”

The State Council has promised to expand China’s nascent property tax, currently being tried in Shanghai and Chongqing. A nationwide tax would dent the enthusiasm of speculators by increasing the cost of holding property. But finding adequate new sources of revenue for local governments, and alternative investment options for households, remain intractable problems.

Many analysts expected rising property sales and investment—the biggest single source of China’s domestic demand—to provide a tailwind to growth into 2013. But a weaker property market will hit demand for everything from steel to furniture to a car to park in the garage. Commodity exporters like Australia and Brazil, which feed China’s steel mills, could also suffer.

Real-estate developers come into the downturn with their balance sheets relatively robust. “The listed developers had strong sales in 2012 and also raised debt in the bond market,” said Mr. Du, the Credit Suisse analyst. “They are saying that local governments will go bankrupt before they do.”

Labour dispatch services in China will provide less flexibility from 1 July 2013

From 1 July 2013, the use of labour dispatch services will likely be a less attractive means of maintaining a more flexible workforce. Companies taking dispatched employees will need to comply with an “equal pay for equal work” principle, and the range of positions for which they can engage dispatched workers will be limited. The registered capital requirement for labour dispatch service providers will also be increased four-fold. Forward planning for both labour dispatch services providers and companies that use dispatched employees is recommended.

Changes to China’s labour dispatch rules were enacted on 28 December 2012 by way of amendments to China’s Labour Contract Law. The amendments will be effective from 1 July 2013. For comment on the draft amendments that were circulated for public comment in mid-2012, please see our July 2012 e-bulletin.

Background

Labour dispatch practices involve a business choosing to outsource workers from third-party dispatch agencies rather than directly employing the workers. This can result in cost-savings and make it easier to terminate the relationship with the worker.

New provisions

The Labour Contract Law amendments introduce a number of changes, some of which are consistent with those in the draft amendment circulated in mid-2012. The first four changes listed below were not in the mid-2012 draft, while the remainder of the changes noted below are substantially the same as those in the mid-2012 draft:

• The registered capital of a labour dispatch company must be at least RMB2,000,000. This represents a four-fold increase from the current requirement of RMB500,000. Companies currently providing such services will need to increase their registered capital in order to provide further labour dispatch services.

• A labour dispatch company must have permanent business premises and facilities that are suitable for the conduct of their business. While it is unclear exactly what this will mean in practice, any existing dispatch service provider would be wise to carefully review the new requirements before renewing their leases.

• Employment by labour dispatch is only a supplemental form of employment for Chinese enterprises, with directemployment by labour contract being the basic form of employment. Identifying labour dispatch as supplementary is aimed at preventing the overuse of labour dispatch.

• The number of dispatched employees engaged by an employer may not exceed a certain percentage of its total number of employees. The exact percentage, however, is yet to be stipulated by the labour administrative authority under the State Council.

• To engage in labour dispatch, a labour dispatch company must obtain a permit from the relevant labour bureau. Labour dispatch permits had been explicitly required prior to 2008. However, when the PRC Labour Contract Law came into effect in 2008 it did not include a permit requirement. Under the new rules, a labour dispatch company established before 1 July 2013 will clearly be required to obtain a labour dispatch permit by 1 July 2014 in order to take up new labour dispatch business. Such labour dispatch companies will need to ensure that their registered capital and business premises comply with the new requirements.

• Workers can be dispatched only for “temporary, auxiliary or substitute positions”. Temporary positions cannot be for longer than six months; auxiliary positions are those that support the main business line; and substitute positions are for covering employees on vacations or study leave. The current rules, by contrast, are generally taken to permit long-term dispatch relationships in a wide variety of positions. This amendment emphasizes the supplemental nature of labour dispatch and is aimed at preventing labour dispatch from being a substitute for direct employment.

• The amendments require equal pay for equal work; that is, the same remuneration standard should apply to both dispatched employees and directly hired employees. Any existing labour contracts and labour dispatch agreements that are inconsistent with the “equal pay for equal work” requirement will need to be amended.

• Employers and dispatch agencies violating the law may be fined between RMB5,000 and RMB10,000 per dispatched worker if they fail to correct the violations within the time period specified by the relevant labour bureau.

Under the new rules, employers that have been relying on dispatched workers might be required to directly employ more workers. This would increase payrolls, and make future down-sizing more difficult and more expensive.