Category Candidates & Labor market

Airbus to hire 600 staff for new China plant

ZHUHAI • Airbus said yesterday it would hire 600 staff for its new assembly plant to be built in the north Chinese port city of Tianjin.

Speaking at a media briefing at Airshow China, the country’s only air show and exhibition, Laurence Barron, president of Airbus China, said staff would be trained on the existing production line in Hamburg, Germany.

Airbus announced last week that it would open an Airbus A320 assembly plant that would eventually make four planes a month, with the first expected to be completed in 2009.

Airbus will ship sections of aircraft from Hamburg to Tianjin for final assembly.

The construction of the plant, near Beijing, was announced last week, along with China’s purchase of 150 A320 aircraft in a deal worth about $10bn, with delivery expected from 2009, Barron said.

It brings the total order to 300, following China’s order last year of 150 Airbus planes.

Barron said some of the Chinese order would be made in Tianjin but some planes would also be made for the European market.

He would not reveal further details about the plant or its future development until it received final approval from the Chinese government, which was preparing a formal feasibility report.

However, Barron highlighted the importance of the fast-growing Chinese market.

“(China) is a very important market. With its air traffic doubling here every five years, it’s becoming or has already become a major market in the world. We are taking China extremely seriously,” he told reporters.

Airbus estimated that China would need around 1,790 planes over the next 20 years.

The European company is seeking to undercut US rival Boeing, which has about two-thirds of the lucrative Chinese civil aviation sector and says it is aiming for a 50 per cent market share.

Analysts said the latest developments could be significant in helping Airbus achieve its goal.

China now has 150 million migrant workers: report

BEIJING (Reuters) – Chinese officials estimate the migrant population has reached 150 million, doubling over the past decade as poor rural residents flocked to cities to take part in the country’s economic boom, state media said on Sunday.

The figure for migrants now amounts to 11.5 percent of the population of China, the world’s most populous nation, Xinhua news agency reported, citing Wang Guoqiang, deputy director of the State Population and Family Planning Commission.

More than 80 percent are rural migrants seeking jobs and would make up the majority of the floating population for a long time, Wang told a national conference in Shanghai.

In Shanghai one third of the city’s population of 5.81 million people were from other places, Xinhua cited statistics from last year as showing.

Farmers from vast rural China have flocked into cities since market reforms started in 1980s, contributing to the country’s economic boom by staffing construction sites, factories and restaurants.

But they have met barriers in getting social benefits such as health care and education for their children.

China’s pension system covers more people

China’s national pension system was covering 182.42 million people by the end of September, up 4.3 percent year on year, the Ministry of Labor and Social Security said in Beijing Thursday.

In the first nine months of the year, some 7.54 million people were newly covered by the pension system, a spokesperson of the ministry told Xinhua.

A total of 339.4 billion yuan (43 billion U.S. dollars) were paid out to retirees between January and September, the spokesperson said, adding that no overdues have been reported so far.

The pension system received revenues totaling 403.5 billion yuan in the first nine months, an increase of 16.1 percent over the same period of 2005.

Source: Xinhua

Talent Shortages Become A Global Issue

The Infosys campus on the outskirts of Bangalore looks like a chunk of the rich world that has been reassembled amidst the dust and debris of India. The echoes of Silicon Valley are everywhere. The journey there involves a wild ride along dirt roads, but the 22-hectare (54-acre) campus itself is all cut grass and neatly planted flowers. It has every possible amenity, from gyms to yoga studios, from banks to bowling alleys. The restaurants serve 14 different cuisines. Many of the buildings are in the low-slung Californian style, but some of the largest are modelled on Western icons, such as the Sydney Opera House, the Louvre pyramid or Rome’s Basilica of St Peter.

Infosys Technologies was started in 1981 by seven Indian entrepreneurs with 10,000 rupees (about $1,000 at the time) between them. The software giant now has annual revenues of $2.2 billion and 58,000 employees. But it is just one of a hundred companies in Bangalore’s Electronics City. Bangalore is India’s software capital, with 140,000 software engineers (more than in Silicon Valley, the locals boast), and Electronics City is a custom-built high-tech haven. The signs are a list of the world’s biggest IT companies, from multinationals such as Hewlett-Packard and Motorola to home-grown giants such as Infosys and Wipro.

Electronics City is the meeting point of the West’s demand for high-tech services and India’s supply of brain power. The dramatic fall in the cost of communications made it possible for Western companies to outsource services, and a newly liberalised India could offer a huge supply of cheap brain workers. Every year India produces around 2.5m university graduates, including 400,000 engineers and 200,000 IT professionals. India’s National Association of Software and Service Companies (NASSCOM) calculates that the country has 28% of the world’s IT offshore talent.

Indians point to the advantages that they bring to the market. They work while the West sleeps; they speak (splendid) English; they can throw huge numbers of people at a job. But at the heart of the boom is a simple sum. The cost of an Indian graduate is roughly 12% of that of an American one. Indian graduates also work more: an average of 2,350 hours a year compared with 1,900 hours in America and 1,700 in Germany. The bottom line is that you can buy almost ten Indian brains for the price of one American one.

The outsourcing boom shows no sign of slowing. Gartner, a research firm, estimates that global spending on IT outsourcing will rise from $193 billion in 2004 to $260 billion in 2009. But there are caveats. The most important is that Indian-based companies themselves are encountering severe skills shortages. Wage inflation in India’s IT sector is about 16% a year, and turnover is 40%. NASSCOM predicts that India’s IT sector will face a shortfall of 500,000 professionals by 2010. GE Capital has posted signs in its Indian offices saying “Trespassers will be recruited”.

Skills shortages are at their most acute among managers. Several Indian companies have had to bring in Western CEOs: the Tata Group, for example, has put Raymond Bickson, a Hawaiian, in charge of its hotel business. Good middle managers are rare: annual wage increases for project managers in IT have averaged 23% a year over the past four years.

Aspiring to world class

How can a country with a billion people suffer from talent shortages? Some reasons are familiar. The number of people with relevant skills is tiny: only 11% of the relevant age group go on to higher education, and older people have had their management skills blunted by the old licence raj. Moreover, growth is so fast that it would strain any educational system, let alone one as ramshackle as India’s. For example, in the four years to March 2006 Infosys increased its payroll from about 10,700 to over 58,000—a compound annual growth rate of 53%.

The second caveat is that Indian-based companies are determined to move upmarket. They have mastered the basics: almost 400 of the companies ranked highest by the Software Engineering Institute at Carnegie Mellon University are in India. Now they want to become world-class. This means pushing into more sophisticated areas such as “integrated solutions” and consulting. It also means adopting the latest productivity-boosting techniques, such as applying lean-manufacturing techniques to software development, a favourite strategy at Wipro. At the same time Western multinationals are exporting more and more complicated tasks.

The looming skills shortage and the drive upmarket have made companies obsessive about finding and holding on to the right people. They are investing heavily in education and training, partly to attract the best talent and partly to keep their existing workers up to speed. “We’re investing in training like the Dickens,” says Nandan Nilekani, Infosys’s CEO. The company has increased its training budget from $100m to $125m. It has also moved one of its board members, T.V. Mohandas Pai, from chief financial officer to director of human resources to show that it means business. In the year to March 2006 Infosys screened 1.4m applications, tested 164,000 applicants and interviewed 48,700 to make 21,000 appointments.

Companies are also getting much more imaginative about identifying new sources of talent. Wipro has different training programmes for different talent pools, including one to help people get a university degree while working for the company. Mr Pai describes Infosys as a “human-capital supply-chain company”. But to keep the supply chain going, India must improve its universities.

Versions of Bangalore’s Electronics City are in evidence in a number of developing countries, and so are skills shortages. China is seeing double-digit wage inflation and labour turnover in its IT sector. Senior managers are particularly scarce: two in three companies report difficulties in filling senior positions. Shanghai Automotive, China’s biggest carmaker, and Lenovo, its biggest computer-maker, have recently hired American bosses. But other skills are also in short supply: Chinese airlines, for instance, are importing pilots.

If Western companies were initially attracted to the developing world by the low price of talent, they have now moved on to other considerations. Srini Koppolu, the head of Microsoft’s India Development Centre (MSIDC), explains that one reason why Microsoft established a development centre in Hyderabad was to gain an edge in the talent war. Being in India gives you access to first-rate techies who do not want to move abroad. MSIDC has grown from 20 employees in 1998 to over 900 today.

The other advantage is local knowledge. Vijay Mahajan, a former dean of the Indian School of Business, which sits next to Microsoft’s campus, points out that the developing world is a booming market as well as a huge labour pool. GE calculates that 60% of its growth over the coming decade will come from the developing world, compared with 20% over the past decade. And the only way to understand the new market is to be immersed in it.

Many Western companies thought that their goods would almost sell themselves in the developing world. They reckoned without complicated distribution systems, feisty local competitors and idiosyncratic local habits. Packaged-goods companies found that customers did not want their jumbo packets, for example, because they had little money and little storage space. Local people could have told them that.

Hewlett-Packard has set up research facilities in India in the hope of building a stripped-down 5,000-rupee ($109) computer. Electrolux Kelvinator has developed a refrigerator that will stay cold even after a six-hour power failure. Nokia has produced a mobile phone that includes a built-in flashlight and a dust-resistant keypad. In GE’s John F. Welch Technology Centre in Bangalore, 2,200 highly qualified engineers work as part of digitally connected global teams on products as diverse as aircraft engines, power and transport systems and plastics. Cisco’s and Motorola’s Indian research centres are their largest outside America.

Most of these companies have research arms in China as well. Microsoft’s development centre in Beijing is a world leader in graphics, handwriting recognition and voice-synthesisation. Motorola has 16 R&D centres in China. Samsung has set up a handset laboratory with a staff of 300 in Beijing, and Siemens has moved a chunk of its mobile R&D to China.

Think global

This R&D boom in the developing world is part of a bigger trend: the globalisation of R&D. This allows companies to plug into national clusters of excellence (South Korea has been a trailblazer in digital displays, for example, and Israel has an edge in wireless telecoms). It gives multinationals access to once secretive university labs in Shanghai and Moscow. And it speeds up innovation, because global teams can work around the clock.

Still, it is one thing to send humdrum work to Electronics City and supervise high-tech drudges, quite another to outsource bits of your core business and manage world-class skills. That involves much more than co-ordinating activities across geographical boundaries. For example, how do you disperse innovation around the world without weakening your corporate culture? How do you motivate high-flyers from different cultures? And how do you manage prima donnas across borders? You need world-class management talent, and that, too, is extremely scarce.

Source: The Economist 5 Oct. 2006

Boards in China Need to be More Open as Chinese Economy Globalises

SHANGHAI, China, Oct. 18 /Xinhua-PRNewswire/ — Heidrick & Struggles
International, Inc. (Nasdaq: HSII), the world’s premier executive search
and leadership consulting firm, have announced key landmark findings from a study on Corporate Governance in China. Sponsored by Heidrick & Struggles and conducted with one of China’s world ranked universities, Fudan University in Shanghai, the study represents one of the most comprehensive studies on corporate governance in China to date.

In general, the study found that there is room for growth in corporate governance in China. Characterised by the cultural emphasis on local networks (guanxi), particularly with the government, boards in China tend to be tightly knit communities built on business or personal connections. Amongst the companies studied, 72% of board members were sourced through referrals.

“The study also shows that local enterprises tend to resist the
introduction of foreign directors to sit on their boards, even as China is increasingly part of the global economy. 48% of Chinese state-owned
enterprises and private enterprises would not consider employing foreign
directors. Only 26% will consider hiring foreign directors, amongst which, 69% expect to do so within three years,” said Steve Mulljiner, Managing Partner, Heidrick & Struggles China. “This mindset has to change, as China has yet to develop a pool of strong local talent with in-depth experience to bring Chinese companies into international markets. Chinese companies do not need to look too far to find Chinese-speaking professionals with years of international exposure and market knowledge. In fact, the research shows that the two of the top three preferred sources of foreign directors in the mainland are from neighbouring areas; that is Hong Kong (27%) and Taiwan
(19%), with America (15%) coming in third.”

“The unwillingness to recruit foreign directors indicates that the
internationalization level is low in Chinese enterprises,” said Professor
Lu Xiongwen, dean of the School of Management. “Chinese enterprises either don’t trust foreign directors or think it unnecessary to hire foreign talent. Some enterprises are afraid communication with foreign directors would be difficult due to cultural and language barriers.”

However, foreign invested enterprises have put the employment of
Chinese directors into their agenda as part of their localization strategy. More than 71% of foreign invested enterprises are considering the employment of Chinese directors, among which 87% plan to realize this
within three years. Only 30% of the foreign invested enterprises
interviewed do not intend to employ Chinese directors.

Note to Editors:

The points highlighted here represent partial key findings. Requests
for more data, information or recommendations from the study should be sent to Jennifer Tow, Manifesto Ltd, (852) 2526 1972 or
jennifer@manifesto.com.hk. Arrangements for exclusive interviews can be
made.

About Heidrick & Struggles International, Inc.

Heidrick & Struggles International, Inc. is the world’s premier
provider of senior-level executive search and leadership consulting
services, including talent management, board building, executive
on-boarding and M&A effectiveness. For more than 50 years we have focused
on quality service and built strong leadership teams through our
relationships with clients and individuals worldwide. Today, our leadership experts operate from principal business centers in North America, Latin America, Europe and Asia Pacific. For more information about Heidrick & Struggles, please visit http://www.heidrick.com .

About School of Management, Fudan University

Strategically positioned in Shanghai, an emerging capital of national
economy, trading, finance and transportation, Fudan University can lay
claim to nearly one century of continuous existence. There is no clear date of the initiation of its business education, but teaching existed at Fudan in some form of management in 1917 and formally enrolled undergraduate class of Management Science in 1977.

About the Corporate Governance in China study

Sponsored by Heidrick & Struggles, this Corporate Governance in China
study is the result of 15 months of research, interviews, discussion and
consultation. The research is based on in-depth interviews with the
Chairmen or Presidents of 50 leading PRC and multi-national companies in
China. A total of 1,000 questionnaires were distributed, with over 100
returned. Questionnaire respondents included top-level board members and
executives. The Study covered various industries and different regions.

A strategic study that focused primary on the structure, function, and organization of the boards, as well as the roles of the board members and their relationships, this research is unprecedented in China, and internationally, and provides new and unique insight to corporate governance in China.

Media Contacts

Jennifer Tow
Manifesto Ltd
Tel: +852-2526-1972
Email: jennifer@manifesto.com.hk

Gene Huang
Fudan University
Tel: +86-21-65102737
Email: zhiyinghuang@fudan.edu.cn

Corporate talent much sought after in China

SHANGHAI: Minutes after the news he had quit as chief financial officer of KongZhong Corp, J.P. Gan took a call from a headhunter.

On offer was a top spot at a venture capital-backed Chinese company with plans for an overseas initial public offering.

Chief financial officers and top level executives are in high demand across the globe as cash-rich investment companies put their money to work buying companies, changing management teams, and growing the businesses.

In China, the effect is amplified. Young, western savvy CFOs who have language skills, regulatory knowledge and international experience are highly sought after and hard to find. “Talent is limited, in general. That’s just the way things are in China,” said Jixun Foo, a Shanghai-based managing director of venture capital company Granite Global Ventures.

Aggravating the shortage is the flow of Western educated executives out of the corporate and investment banking sectors and into private equity firms and hedge funds.

While talented chief executives are in demand in China, many investors view equally talented CFOs as more significant and harder to find, given the increased accounting demands required by global securities markets.

Chinese companies need CFOs who can put in place or modernise their financial infrastructure to satisfy investors and regulators.

Gan is leaving KongZhong, a US$250mil Chinese wireless services company, for venture capital firm Qiming Venture Partners in Shanghai. He said he knew at least 10 venture-backed companies hunting for CFOs.

One key executive requirement is solid English skills.

A CFO of a foreign-listed or Hong Kong-listed Chinese company can expect to earn anywhere from US$150,000 to US$500,000, plus options, said several people interviewed for this article, with CEO’s earning slightly more.

Also fuelling CFO demand is a string of successful new China listings, which have sparked a rush to the initial public offerings market. – Reuters

China facing employment crisis with 34.5 mln new job-seekers in next five years

The Chinese government is facing a “severe” employment crisis with 34.5 million people expected to come on to the labor market from 2006 to 2010, according to a senior member of the Chinese People’s Political Consultative Conference (CPPCC).

Chen Mingde, said at a meeting of the Standing Committee of the CPPCC National Committee, China’s top advisory body, that job creation would be crucial to the government’s aim of building a harmonious socialist society.

He said 25 million new job-seekers would enter the market this year, of whom 11 million might find jobs in urban areas, leaving 14 million unemployed.

Chen said employment opportunities could expand if local governments put job creation atop their agenda and vigorously develop the service sector, and small and medium enterprises.

Governments should launch special foundations to encourage private businesses, such as favorable loans, risk funds and investment guarantees for the self-employed.

He said local governments should encourage university graduates to work in rural areas in western China with favorable policies such as minimum salaries and medical care, and subsidies for those who go to undeveloped and remote rural areas.

Source: Xinhua

China lures expatriates but success hard: study

China is one of the easiest places for recruiters to lure expatriate executives, but is also one of the hardest places for them to succeed, according to a study released on Tuesday.

A survey of more than 140 international recruiters by executive recruitment firm Korn/Ferry International found other popular places for expatriate workers were Western Europe, especially Britain, and North America, as well as Southeast Asia, especially Singapore.

The firm’s 10th quarterly executive recruiter index found that the most difficult places to attract expatriates to work included the non-Gulf Middle East, Africa, Central and Eastern Europe, and South America.

“High-growth emerging nations often offer the greatest opportunities for expatriates, but they can also come with the most challenges,” Chris van Someren, president of Korn/Ferry for Europe, Middle East and Africa, said in a statement.

Reasons that assignments failed included the lack of cultural fit, family or personal issues or a lack of direction from managers, the survey showed.

Things were toughest for expatriates in China, Japan and South Korea, the non-Gulf Middle East, and in Central and Eastern Europe, and South America, the poll found.

But 91 percent of the recruiters surveyed said executives with international experience were either extremely or somewhat desirable candidates.

“Expatriate assignments can be extremely beneficial for developing emerging leaders and for providing solutions for organizations undergoing significant growth or change – but expatriates are clearly not a substitute for local talent,” said van Someren.

Recruiters said expatriate programs helped promote better cultural understanding, facilitated the opening of a new branch or office, and were good as a professional development tool.

But expatriate assignments were least effective for addressing local talent shortages, generating new business abroad and improving staff retention.

The poll found the average ideal length for an expatriate posting was about two-and-a-half years.

Checking Out Candidates in China

By Frank Mulligan, Talent Software

If you are hiring staff in China you will at some point have come across people who exaggerate their experience and skills, or downright lie.

An exaggeration will cause you little difficulty because you will be aware that everyone tends to exaggerate a little. A lie on the other hand will cost you a huge amount of money if you do not catch it, and early.

Solutions that deal with these issues are available, both online and offline, but it has to be said that the online ones offer real value. The offline solutions are a little obvious, so you probably would have introduced them already if you could.

Hiring Issues
For the issue of past experience you can get an objective assessment by doing a Reference Check but our research indicates that companies in China only do this for about 10% of staff. The rationale for this seems to be that it is seen as a difficult process.

The biggest issue in China is fake degrees, which can be bought for about RMB400 on the streets. They are exact, perfect copies of original certificates but obviously they are easily identified if you have the original.

Luckily there is a website to check degrees from Chinese universities. All degrees after 2001 can be checked and the system shows you the final certificate with the person’s picture, number and so on.

Dealing with certifications is a little different. There are so many certifications authorities and training companies that you cannot devise a system to be able to deal with this easily. Instead we would recommend that you test the skill.

This could be on paper or online but again our experience shows that companies tend not to do the testing when it is on paper. The tests have to be scored, and often by someone with knowledge of that skill. Online tests score automatically and integrate easily with the online hiring system.

An excellent way of testing to see if someone has really done what they say they have done is Work Samples. All this involves is asking the candidate to produce a piece of work or solve a problem that is specific to the job he is being hired for. This must be done in your office and he has to have all the tools necessary for the solution.

What Could Happen
In case you still do not feel that any checking is really necessary the statistics below will give you more details of what you are letting yourself in for. The statistics are worldwide and cover all aspects of the hiring process.

– 9% of job applicants falsely claimed they had a college degree, listed false employers, or identified jobs that didn’t exist. *Source: Resume Inflation: Two Wrongs May Mean No Rights, by Barbara Kat Repa

– 34% of all application forms contain outright lies about experience, education, and ability to perform essential functions on the job. *Source: Wall Street Journal

– 11% of job applicants misrepresented why they left a former employer. *Source: Resume Inflation: Two Wrongs May Mean No Rights, by Barbara Kat Repa, Nolo .com, 8/801

– Nearly one-third of job applicants listed dates of employment that were inaccurate by more than three months. *Source: Resume Inflation: Two Wrongs May Mean No Rights, by Barbara Kat Repa

– As many as 30% of jobseekers exaggerate their accomplishments, and about 10% ’seriously misrepresent’ their background. *Source: The Complete Reference Checking Book, by Edward C. Adler

– 30% of all business failures are caused by employee theft. *Source: American Management Association and US Chamber of Commerce

– 14.7% of all applicants admit to theft of merchandise from an employer. *Source: Reid Psychological Systems (Don’t Hire a Crook, Dennis DeMay; James R. Flowers, Jr., 1999 Facts on Demand Press, pg. 88)

– 4.4% of all applicants admit to theft of cash from an employer. *Source: Reid Psychological Systems (Don’t Hire a Crook, Dennis DeMay; James R. Flowers, Jr., 1999 Facts on Demand Press, pg. 88)

– 33% of all applicants admit to being tempted to steal from an employer. *Source: Security Magazine, 3/97

– It costs $7,000 to replace a salaried employee, $10,000 to replace a mid-level employee, and $40,000 to replace a senior executive. *Source: Recruiting Times

– In 1999, employers lost 60% of negligent hiring/supervision jury trials. *Source: The Reish and Luftman Practical Guide to Employment Law

– On average, in U.S. businesses, at least half of all new hires don’t work out. *Source: Fortune, 2/00

If you really need professional help on this issue please check out Chinawhys.

Few Asia boards plan CEO succession: survey

Only one-third of company directors in Asia outside Japan have taken formal steps to ensure an orderly succession when a chief executive leaves, a recruitment firm’s study said Monday.
The findings are a stark contrast to some Western countries where up to 80 percent of directors have steps in place to see that when one chief executive departs, a replacement is ready to assume the post.

Among the markets surveyed were China, Hong Kong, Thailand, Malaysia, Singapore, Australia and New Zealand.

The board of directors study was produced by Korn/Ferry International. It looked at boardroom practices of major companies, covering 1,200 directors from 15 economies. Compared to Asia’s 34 percent of directors who had taken formal steps to ensure orderly succession, the Americas, including the United States, Brazil and Colombia, emerged with 76 percent, according to results published in The Straits Times.

Eighty percent of companies in Australia and New Zealand have a process for management succession.

“Boards in the Asia-Pacific are beginning to take a more calculated approach to board governance, adopting more Western practices to improve the performance of their boards,” Marta Grutka, regional director of marketing at Korn/Ferry, was quoted as saying.

Noting that much of Asia has handled management changes through family ties, she said that the process is changing.